August 6, 2021 the CDC fuel the pro vaccine drive by releasing a study claiming that the vaccine affords better protection against the COVID-19 disease than a previous infection.
This was conveniently used to mandate that anyone with a previous infection was not as well protected and still need to line up for the never ending jabs.
This study came after an Israel study showing a previous infection provided better protection.
The CDC study was pounced on by all those pushing the vaccine on their social media networks and other influencer outlets.
It was the news many who are in full blown pro vaccine mode used to shut up their detractors and to do the “just get vaccinated” mic drop.
Data coming out of Israel painted the very opposite reality to this study, and now from a much larger data source Israel has conclusively shown that a previous infection is by far the better protection.
Below is the report we did on this latest study
It has been replicated in other studies with a wave of scientific data that has shown natural immunity to be extremely robust at preventing coronavirus reinfection. Studies from the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Emory University, the Cleveland Clinic, and others have found natural immunity to be incredibly strong months and even a year after infection.
Safe to say the CDC study is not worth the paper it is written on even though the recommendation is still to get people with a prior infection vaccinated to avoid the spread of the virus.
In breaking news the CDC has now had to admit, via the release of a freedom of information act (FOIA) request from a lawyer who asked what data the CDC holds on people with prior infections passing in the disease, that it has none.
CDC ADMITS IT HAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECOVERED COVID PATIENTS SPREADING THE VIRUS
“In response to attorney’s FOIA request, US CDC admits that it has no record of an unvaccinated person spreading COVID after recovering from COVID.”
This just adds more fuel to the fire that the likes of the CDC and the FDA are acting more like shills to the big Pharmaceutical companies rather than acting in the best interest of those that rely on these organisations to put health over profit.
It is bad enough that 40% of the FDA’s funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry without the CDC chiming in with bogus studies to push manufactured pandemics.
This raises the question of what data is medsafe using to make decisions on our behalf.
Many people living in fear will happily march their 5 to 11 year olds out to get the weaker dose of the vaccine, unaware that the potential harm from the jab could out weigh any benefit by some margin.
The Omicron variant is now being used to push the message that kids are at risk. Yet with the numbers growing everyday, the danger of the Omicron only exists in the minds and computers of the modellers.
On the dawn of approving the vaccine for kids, a story comes out of our own first under 10 casualty.
A child posthumously tests positive for covid and this is the headline
“Covid-19: Child under 10 becomes youngest case to die”
Can you even become a case after you pass away?The cause of death is unknown yet it has already become the latest covid statistic.
In what can only be the toughest time for parents, losing a young child, it seems sick to start to bandy about that this tragic moment is due to COVID.
Turning this tragic moment into some form of drive to get the young jabbed, for something that poses less threat than a lightning strike, is why more people don’t trust anything they read on the mainstream media.
It’s going to get worse before it gets better. How much is the question.