Climate Emergency BS

Today Ardern, in what can only be seen a marketing gesture, is putting NZ into a climate emergency

Real Scientific Data says otherwise, but never let the truth get in the way of tax eh?

Many of you will have heard that the “science is settled” when it comes to the phenomenon known as climate change or global warming.

The interesting thing is no scientist has ever conclusively proved that CO2 causes warming. I can hear the keyboards tapping into google as we speak, and no doubt many of you will land on a page called “Skeptical science.”

This page is the brainchild of an Australian propaganda expert, John Cook. He has a PhD in cognitive Science and is a cartoonist, as well as indoctrinating people into the anthropogenic warming diatribe with courses such as, ”making sense of climate change denial”

He actually has a free course on how to deal with so called “denial”

On this free course you can learn the following

  • How to recognise the social and psychological drivers of climate science denial
  • How to better understand climate change: the evidence that it is happening, that humans are causing it and the potential impacts
  • How to identify the techniques and fallacies that climate myths employ to distort climate science
  • How to effectively debunk climate misinformation

John Cook’s role is in communication, he works for the George Mason University Centre for Climate Change Communication. Let that sink in for a second. He is the self appointed marketing arm of the man made warming movement.

I have been banned from his website as the questions I asked were just too hard the answer. So rather than trying to engage in healthy debate, I got banned.

They did send me a graph before doing so. Sounds like they are not too open to debate.

here’s a graph too that shows the temperature versus CO2 increase.

Skeptical science has a big section dedicated to answering questions on the claims of us so called deniers. I went through his debunking and debunked his debunking. I’ll post that up later today. However, let us look at some empirical evidence on if CO2 causes warming.

Skeptical science says it has empirical evidence of how CO2 causes warming. I can assure you is far from empirical evidence; you will see what I mean with their summation of the evidence that they bring

Like a detective story, first you need a victim, in this case the planet Earth: more energy is remaining in the atmosphere.

Then you need a method, and ask how the energy could be made to remain. For that, you need a provable mechanism by which energy can be trapped in the atmosphere, and greenhouse gases provide that mechanism.

Next, you need a ‘motive’. Why has this happened? Because CO2 has increased by nearly 50% in the last 150 years and the increase is from burning fossil fuels.

And finally, the smoking gun, the evidence that proves ‘whodunit’: energy being trapped in the atmosphere corresponds exactly to the wavelengths of energy captured by CO2.

A detective story, sounds very scientific dear watson?

Here is the page if you want to look for yourself

Empirical evidence of CO2 not causing warming

So lets take a science team who have done some study themselves.

They are a team made up of a very highly educated father and son.

Dr Ronan Connolly, who has a in chemistry and a Phd in Computational Chemistry.

And Ronan’s father Michael Connelly. Who has qualifications in Physics, chemistry, electronic engineering, computer science, mathematics and statistics he has studied these to varying heights including,, and PhD level

The two have taken data from

  • 13 million weather balloons.
  • 7000 weather stations
  • Satellite measurements of incoming and outgoing radiation, atmospheric temperatures, sea levels, atmospheric CO2 and sea ice extents.
  • Climate proxy dtata sets
  • Radioactive physics algorithms used by current climate models
  • More than 500 todal gauge records
  • Mass balance records from more than 100 glaciers
  • Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements from 11 monitoring stations

They state that on top of the above study, “We have read and analysed 1000s of peer-reviewed articles on climate change. In addition, we studied those findings reported in non-peer reviewed sources, such as internet sites and blogs.

We designed and carried out a number of new laboratory experiments to study energy transmission within the atmosphere.

We developed new analytical tools for studying weather balloon data.

We identified major statistical, logical and methodological errors in a number of widely-used studies. We then reanalysed the data used by these studies using more appropriate methods.”

They have received no funding for this work. So, before the Karens start going on about this being funded by oil companies, this is work they undertook themselves to answer the question on Anthropogenic warming.

What did they find using the data and their understanding of the fundamentals of our understanding of chemistry and Physics?

1. We are not warming the planet

For several decades now, it has been widely believed that humans are causing unusual global warming by increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Our research has convinced us that this man-made global warming theory is wrong. We will explain why we have come to this conclusion on this website.

It is true that humans have been increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, because of our use of fossil fuels. Before the Industrial Revolution, carbon dioxide seems to have been about 0.03% of the atmosphere, while it is now about 0.04%.

However, our research has shown that:

It doesn’t matter whether we double, treble or even quadruple the carbon dioxide concentration. Carbon dioxide has no impact on atmospheric temperatures.

We carried out new laboratory experiments, and analysed the data from millions of weather balloons, to calculate exactly how much global warming carbon dioxide was causing. When we did this, we discovered that the answer was zero.

It turns out that some of the assumptions used in man-made global warming theory (and in the current climate models) had never actually been tested. When we tested them, we discovered that they were invalid.

See the link below for a discussion of why:


In addition, we have also shown that:

The “unusual global warming” that has caused such concern is not unusual, after all.

We found that the world naturally switches between periods of global warming and periods of global cooling, with each period lasting several decades.

We also identified a number of serious mistakes in the studies which had claimed that there has been unusual global warming. These mistakes meant that the amount of warming in the last global warming period (1980s-2000s) was overestimated and the amount of cooling in the last global cooling period (1950s-1970s) was underestimated.

When these mistakes are corrected, it turns out that it was just as warm in the 1930s-1940s as it is now.

See the following links for our global temperature analysis:



Summary: Summary: “Global temperature changes of the last millennium”

2. We are not causing catastrophic climate change

In recent years, we have been inundated with tragic reports of disasters from hurricanes, typhoons, floods, droughts, etc. We are also told that there have been dramatic decreases in the Arctic sea ice, and that sea levels are rising. This has led many people to believe that we are causing an increase in extreme weather events, melting in the Arctic, dangerous sea level rises.

However, this perception of catastrophic climate changes seems to be mostly down to simple improvements in our climate monitoring technology.

Our ability to monitor and report on extreme weather events and changes in the climate has dramatically improved in recent years. This means that we are now able to detect events and changes which we wouldn’t have noticed when they occurred in the past. This doesn’t mean these events and changes are unusual. It just means that we’ve only started noticing them!

We discuss our analysis for some of these phenomena in the following essays:

Is the Arctic melting?

Is man-made global warming causing more hurricanes?

What is happening to sea levels?

3. The scientific consensus on global warming was premature

First of all, the theory behind man-made global warming was based on a number of fundamental assumptions which had never been tested. When we tested those assumptions, we found that several of them were invalid.

Our research also identified several important energy transmission mechanisms which had been neglected by the theory.

Taken together, these results show that the man-made global theory was wrong. This means that the scientific consensus on global warming was also wrong.

Secondly, it seems that the attempts to get a scientific consensus on man-made global warming were overly forced. Although there are a lot of scientists who believe that we are warming the planet, and that we need to urgently do something about, there are quite a few climate scientists who don’t agree with that.

If you want to watch a great presentation from these two then check this out

Loading spinner
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x