Government and WHO CORONA Lies

This is an article that was written by Dr. Robert Malone the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.

Below is a link to support his work

https://substack.com/profile/49176289-robert-w-malone-md-ms

It was written about the US response but this could be written about New Zealand, you would simply need to replace some of the people as below

Fauici with Bloomfield and where appropriate  Michael Baker, Siouxsie Wiles and the other celebrity scientists.

It is virtually identical in any country that went down the lock them up and sell fear opportunity propagated by the globalists, but it is uncanny how this could have been written for Ne Zealand.

The only differences is our hospital system is not as influenced by the drug companies and insurers as it is in the US, some of the stats would ned to be adjusted as we didn’t quite have the same opportunity for our hospital system to be the purveyors of death at the same rate as in the U.S. with the heavy incentivised use of Remdesivir and ventilation

I see our Pharmac has gone down the Remdesivir road too, so it would be interesting to research how this has worked out for people hospitalised with moderate to severe COVID-19 as compared to those who took Ivermectin

Remdesivir is a drug that’s never been approved in New Zealand, it causes kidney failure in up to 20% of patients and was stopped being used in trials for Ebola as if Ebola didn’t kill the patient, Remdesivir did.

The current fact sheet prioritises its availability to people who have not taken the vaccine and also that they have not sustained requirement for supplemental oxygen, and are not showing signs of improvement from other treatment. So its a last resort treatment here, rather than the incentivised one in the USA.

What I find interesting is Medsafe is strongly recommending people not use Ivermectin due to lack of testing yet the medical advisory group make this claim about Remdesivir,

‘The Therapeutics Technical Advisory Group (TAG) considers that it is reasonable to offer remdesivir to people with early COVID-19 in the community who are at very high risk of progression to requiring in- hospital treatment. However, we acknowledge there is limited evidence to inform the efficacy of remdesivir in the current phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and that the significant resource constraints faced by most of the New Zealand health system presently will limit the capacity to deliver intravenous remdesivir to outpatients.”

One of the big differences between the two is price. Remdesivir  is $3,666 for a 5-day course where Ivermectin is $54 for 20 tablets.

The claim is Ivermectin is unproven, but so is Remdesivir. I wonder who is making these claims? could it be the Pharmaceutical companies who rather we used products that cost thousands of dollars versus reappropriated drugs that cost a few cents.

Regardless of this hatred towards Ivermectin, thousands of doctors are using this and prescribing it to people who are showing severe COVID-19

Any way read this a see how much is relevant to NZ. The actual tital is

Government and WHO CORONA Lies

This is not subtle. Incompetence or Nefarious Evil Intent? Hard to tell the difference.

As the sitting POTUS and his entourage is about to head over to the UN and WHO for a little quality time and a vote on circumventing the constitution, this seems a good time to briefly review the current state of affairs.

Ask yourself, have these people earned our trust? Do they have any right to set and police global health policies? Apparently Joe Biden (or whoever is his current puppet master) and Tony Fauci think so.

 


A brief list of some of the COVID lies we have heard over the last couple of years (with thanks and acknowledgment to Dr. Scott Atlas):

  1. SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has a far higher fatality rate than influenza virus by several orders of magnitude
  2. Everyone has a significant risk of death from COVID-19.
  3. No one has immunity, because this virus is new (“novel”) and so expedited vaccine development and deployment is essential.
  4. Everyone is dangerous and spreads the infection
  5. Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread of disease.
  6. Locking down- closing schools and businesses, confining people to their homes, stopping non-COVID medical care, and eliminating travel will stop/eliminate the virus.
  7. Masks will protect everyone and stop the spread.
  8. Immune protection can only be obtained with a vaccine.
  9. Natural immunity conferred by infection and recovery is short lived and inferior to vaccine-induced immunity.

Who was responsible for these lies?

  1. Deborah Birx (who was trained by Anthony Fauci).

    She wrote virtually all official White House guidance to state Governors.

    This usurped constitutional authority of states to set public health policies.

  2. Anthony Fauci
  3. Francis Collins

What were their policy decisions?

  1. “Flatten the Curve”… Then “Stop all cases”
  2. No masks. All masked.
  3. Lockdowns: School closures, business shutdowns, limits on medical care, a host of restrictions, mandates and quarantines.
  4. Perverse financial incentives for hospitals to over diagnose COVID-19, over use Remdesivir and ventilation, and cause a massive wave of iatrogenic (drug/doctor caused) excess death.
  5. Stop early treatment and block repurposed drug use.
  6. “come back to the hospital when your lips are blue”

What was the effect of their policy decisions?

  1. Virus? >1,000,000 American deaths attributed to the virus. One of this highest mortality rates per capita in the world.
  2. Lockdowns? Caused massive deaths and severely harmed millions of families and children, especially working class and poor.

The better alternative was known by March, 2020, known as “targeted protection”

Ioannidis STAT March 17 2020.

 


Katz, NY Times March 20 2020


Atlas, Washington Times, March 26, 2020


Kulldorf, CNN em Espanol 20 Aug 2020 (he could not get it published in English..)


What were the alternative policies proposed?

  1. Increase the protection of the high-risk groups with an unprecedented focus
  2. Reopen society, including medical care, schools, businesses and hospitals
  3. Carefully monitor hospital capacity and supplement when needed

This set of policy recommendations was codified on October 04, 2020 as the Great Barrington Declaration.

According to Wikipedia:

“The Great Barrington Declaration was an open letter published in October 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns.[1][2] It claimed harmful COVID-19 lockdowns could be avoided via the fringe notion of “focused protection”, by which those most at risk could purportedly be kept safe while society otherwise continued functioning normally.[3] The envisaged result was herd immunity in three months as SARS-CoV-2 swept through.[1][2][3] Authored by Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford, Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, and Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University, it was drafted at the American Institute for Economic Research in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, signed there on 4 October 2020, and published on 5 October.[2][4] The document presumes without evidence that the disease burden of mass infection can be tolerated, that any infection confers long term sterilizing immunity, and makes no mention of physical distancing, masks, contact tracing,[5] or long COVID, which has left patients suffering from debilitating symptoms months after the initial infection.”

Why did the public believe the Lockdowners”?

  1. Culture of trust (of the credentialed class)
  2. Fear (actively weaponized against the public by the government, WHO, and legacy media)
  3. Demonization of opposing views (globally coordinated propaganda and censorship campaign)
  4. Legacy media, social media, and political campaigns

Key messaging to support the lies.

  1. If you are against lockdowns, you are selfish and choosing the economy over lives
  2. If you are against lockdowns, you are for allowing the infection to spread without mitigation and therefore in favor of unnecessary and preventable deaths

Active Destruction and Denial of fundamental public health ethics.

“If a school is implementing a testing strategy, testing should be offered on a voluntary basis. It is unethical and illegal to test someone who does not want to be tested, including students whose parents or guardians do not want them to be tested”

CDC, October 13, 2020

Mandating vaccines for Children

“But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.”

Eric Rubin, MD. Editor in Chief, New England Journal of Medicine. October 26, 2021

FDA Advisory meeting on vaccine approval in children.

How to restore trust in Science?

  1. Admit errors in public forums
  2. Change Leadership
  3. Strengthen conflict of interest rules and add term limits on government agency leadership positions
  4. Clarify definition of “public health emergency” with strict time limits, adding legislative action requirement to extend
  5. Restore appropriate roles of health agencies to advise, rather than set rules
  6. Fact check the media
  7. Decentralize research funding
  8. Introduce new transparency and accountability
    1. De anonymize reviews of papers and grants
    2. Increase independent oversight to government agencies and committees
    3. Evaluate universities regarding ethics, free debate
    4. New training programs, including logic and ethics for journalists, doctors, and scientists

 

 

Loading spinner
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x