Negative efficacy in Scotland

Seems some of the warnings from those pesky conspiracy theory immunologists are coming true. Particularly in the double jabbed population

Rates per 100,000 per population of the unvaccinated aged right through to the triple jabbed are as follows.

  1. Unvaccinated – 252.76 per 100,000
  2. 1 jab – 340.60 per 100,000
  3. 2 jabs – 515.70 per 100,000
  4. 3 jabs – 379.53 per 100,000

This is mirroring other areas showing an increase in infections of the vaccinated,

But don’t worry because it’s stopping you going to hospital right?

  1. Unvaccinated- 24.66 per 100,000
  2. 1 jab – 23.26 per 100,000
  3. 2 jabs – 27.62 per 100,000
  4. 3 jabs – 6,84 per 100,000

It seems that if you have had 3 jabs is better than 2, but as for the unvaccinated clogging up hospital -, the number of people who have been vaccinated and are in hospital is 375 versus 82 unvaccinated. So 82% of hospitalisations are vaccinated to some degree.

The real issue here is that the 3rd dose jabbed, will within a few months have reduced protection and the efficacy will also become negative. Just as the double jabbed are now showing greater infections, hospitalisation sand deaths.

Many doctors are saying, we can’t keep jabbing people every few months.

Now for deaths

  1. Unvaccinated- 7.30 per 100,000
  2. Single jab – 12.11 per 100,000
  3. Double jabbed 15.49 per 100,000
  4. triple jabbed 1.60 per 100,000

Oh how the day of reckoning comes closer as the medical profession awaken from the trance.

Yes clearly the 3rd jab is preventing death from COVID at a far greater number but for how long.

Perhaps 3rd time is a charm but it is no secret now that these vaccines lose efficacy in preventing hospitalisation and the spread is greater in all vaccinated status including the triple jabbed.

How can they justify vaccine passports?

This data has come from the latest Public Health Scotland Statistical Report below.

Loading spinner
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x