A single action Colt cannot fire itself Alec

Whilst the pressure increases on Baldwin about who is to blame for his almost execution style “accidental shooting,” some legal eagles speculate that the only thing that will save Baldwin is his political alignment with the New Mexico Attorney General, who is a Democrat.

Other legal experts are not so sure and think Baldwin should not face any charges if he was told the gun was “cold”

Baldwin claims he feels no guilt for his part in the shooting. perhaps his legal team told him to say that as guilt is usually associated with an admission of wrong doing.

At this point Baldwin seems to be doing a good job of incriminating himself with his changing story and very public explanations of what happened on that day. Seems he is not interested in his right to remain silent

Let’s look at an expert handling a Colt the way it should be treated on a movie set and all the mechanisms that prevent the weapon firing itself.

If this was anyone else, I would hazard a guess that they would be looking at a minimum charge of involuntary manslaughter.

We shall see

Share this post

Welcome To Arderns NZ

NZ: crime is on the rise, can’t the Police do something?

Police: Sorry, we don’t have the resources to do that

NZ: Gang numbers have doubled!

Police: Sorry, we don’t have the resources to stem the gangs

NZ: A person went into a restaurant without a Vax Pass

Police: An officer will be there momentarily for your safety

New Zealand Prime Minister Expresses Concern LGBTQ Conversion Therapy Ban  Could Harm Religious Freedom
Share this post

Informed Consent eh?

The below text is from Dr Guy Hatchard who was one of the original doctors involved with providing assistance to the COVID response advisory team.

He recently lost a dear friend to adverse effects of the vaccine.

This is a subject that is touchy, given how many people have embraced or have been mandated into taking the vaccine. As it can not be undone it is always a difficult subject to broach. that is understanadble and therefore we can only hope effects are as minor as they can be.

Whilst the outlook for most is likely to be fine, it is the claim that the mRNA vaccine is both safe and effective with adequate testing that is something that is questionable at best. Particularly with the release of data from the FDA on the trials.

Dr Hatchard wrote a letter to Ardern raising his concerns about the safe messaging and after the death of his friend he has become somewhat of an actavist.

He posts on Facebook the following concerns.

“Upon the FDA releasing info on the Adverse reactions we find that it is likely Medsafe was not provided full disclosure on adverse events given the “safe and effective” mantra the government, celebrities and media outlets have been brainwashing New Zealanders with.

“Document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reportedOver 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious.”

This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government

We examine the implications for government

Up until now, New Zealand GPs and hospitals have been provided with a fact sheet from Pfizer listing 21 possible adverse events as a result of vaccination. All of these are minor, requiring little or no treatment other than rest, with the exception of severe allergic reactions, myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart). As a result, most of the many thousands of New Zealanders reporting adverse effects post vaccination have been sent home with little more than advice to take an aspirin and rest. Some have been told that their conditions may be unrelated medical events, psychosomatic, or due to anxiety on their part.

Relying on the short official Pfizer fact sheet as a guide, Medsafe, our NZ medicines regulatory body, has only accepted one out of the 100+ deaths actually reported to them as related to vaccination. Most are listed as unrelated, under investigation, or unknowable. By contrast, the NZ Health Forum and other groups have collected unofficial reports of adverse effects and death proximate to vaccination. Out of 670+ reports of death compiled by the Forum, 270 have already been investigated by medical professionals and closely linked to known adverse effects. Following the publication of the new Pfizer document many more are expected to be connected with vaccination. Reports describe symptoms such as chest pain, brain fog, extreme fatigue, neurological symptoms, tachycardia, stroke, heart attacks, and many more. Collected data suggests that as many as two-thirds of adverse event enquiries made to medical staff by vaccine recipients have not been reported to CARM—the NZ system of adverse event reporting. Medsafe itself estimates in its Guide to Adverse Reaction Reporting that in NZ only 5% of adverse events are reported. As a result the NZ public is completely unaware of the extent of reported possible risks of vaccination.

The just released Pfizer document which is being circulated widely in the public domain and can downloaded from websites is entitled 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021 Therefore the reported side effects predate the vaccine rollout in New Zealand. The report itself was finalised by Pfizer on 30 April 2021. Did Pfizer supply this information to our government during the early days of our universal vaccination programme? If so the results should have been shared with our medical professionals, politicians, and the public. Many of the new 100+ listed new adverse event types now released by Pfizer in this 38 page document pose long term risks to health. Until very recently, the document was being withheld by Pfizer who maintained it should be kept confidential. There is a strong possibility that very large numbers of New Zealanders will suffer long term injury as a result.

How did this happen without anyone’s knowledge?

Even though the Pfizer vaccine had undergone very short trials and had provisional approval only, Medsafe did not update its CARM adverse event reporting system to make it mandatory rather than voluntary.

Medsafe did not advise GPs and Hospital staff to be on high alert for adverse events and report them rapidly and in detail.

The Government ignored the unprecedented numbers of adverse events being reported to Medsafe and circulating in the community and on social media.

The Government instituted a public relations, promotional, and media campaign advising the public that the Pfizer covid-19 mRNA vaccine was completely safe and free of serious side effects, giving the impression that there were no side effects—not even the known serious effects of heart inflammation that Pfizer had already admitted.

Unaccountably, conditions imposed by the contract that our Government signed with Pfizer for the supply of vaccines have not been made public. We suspect that the contract contains standard clauses similar to those used with drugs that have completed safety trials, such as a provision that public discussion of adverse events may only be undertaken in conjunction with the company supplying the drug. If this is the case, it will have hamstrung Medsafe and our Government in their approach to assessment and public discussion of adverse events.

What are the new risks of vaccination?

Anyone reading the new Pfizer adverse event report compilation will be staggered. The sheer density of the technical medical terms and disease names are nevertheless broken down into recognisable and serious categories of illness—kidney failure, stroke, cardiac events, pregnancy complications, inflammation, neurological disease, autoimmune failure, paralysis, liver failure, blood disorders, skin disease, musculoskeletal problems, arthritis, respiratory disease, DVT, blood clots, vascular disease, haemorrhage, loss of sight, Bell’s palsy, and epilepsy.

How has this affected New Zealand?

Whilst even the official Medsafe record of adverse effects and the unofficial lists show that the immediate risks of covid vaccination could be as much as 50 – 300 times greater than even the most risky of previous traditional vaccines (such as the smallpox jab), and whilst the long term effects are unknown, 90% of eligible New Zealanders have gone ahead with vaccination having accepted the assurances of safety and efficacy from the government, or having been forced to get vaccinated under threat of loss of employment and freedom of movement. Feeling the fear of covid that has been generated by reports in the international and local media, most people completing vaccination heaved a great sigh of relief—that is one huge worry off my mind, now I can get on with my life. Those finding that no immediate insurmountable reaction had surfaced (the majority) understandably agreed with the government: “What is all the fuss about? Why shouldn’t everyone do this, or be made to do this? It is a social good that will protect everyone”

BUT there is a huge iceberg in the path of the good ship New Zealand hidden under the waves of relief. Thousands are quietly suffering debilitating illness, unacknowledged and in some cases untreated by their doctors. For those who survived vaccination without immediate injury this was not a problem because they didn’t know about it apart from one or two complaints from friends that might just be random coincidences.

This has brought about a division in New Zealand society which the government created in the name of public safety. Thousands of dedicated servants of the nation including teachers, health workers, and others are being stigmatised and forced out of their jobs in a manner horrifyingly reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany. The government did this despite knowing that the Pfizer vaccine was neither fully tested, safe, nor particularly effective. Judges handed down decisions in courts supporting the government mandates unaware of crucial mRNA vaccine safety data, all because Pfizer had withheld this information, and the government had not done its due diligence. Had the true position been known, the High Court’s NZ Bill of Rights analysis may well have been different and its provision which guarantees that every individual should be able to make their own medical choices might still be intact.

Pfizer’s conclusions

Pfizer concludes the released document with a statement “Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit:risk balance for BNT162b2.” PM stands for the Post Marketing data set they are evaluating of 42,086 reported adverse events. Pfizer makes this bald claim of benefit despite admitting that “the magnitude of underreporting is unknown”. This document contains no further substantive information in support of this claim of benefit:risk balance other than a mysterious reference to “the known safety profile of the vaccine”.

The benefit:risk argument is in essence saying: covid-19 is a serious illness and our calculations show that more people will be injured by the disease than are being injured by the vaccine, therefore there will be a net benefit. This argument falls over because of at least three very important factors: Firstly treatment options have improved and thereby the risk of serious illness and death from covid has been greatly reduced. Secondly the risk of covid is not evenly spread. People with comorbidities (other conditions) and the elderly are at very high risk. Most other people are at very low risk. Thus vaccination could subject people at low risk from covid to a higher risk from vaccination. Approaches to preventive health education can reduce the covid risk to people with comorbidities more than vaccination can. For example a study published in the BMJ found that people following a plant based diet have a 73% reduced risk of serious illness. Data from the UK Biobank has been analysed by researchers from Manchester and Oxford Universities and the West Indies who found that shift workers (who typically have disrupted bioclocks) have three times the risk of being hospitalised with covid. Preventive remedies include changes in diet such as the introduction of more fresh fruit, vegetables, and fibre, and reductions in known unhealthy habits such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption, an overly sedentary lifestyle, a predominance of ultra processed foods, and many more. The third and most significant reason the benefit:risk argument falls over is the sheer range of adverse reaction types observed by Pfizer and kept hidden until now.

How could a single vaccine have such a wide range of effects?

The technical reasons why mRNA vaccines can have such broad effects on human health are understood by those working in gene therapy. Perfectly stable DNA function is critical to life. In turn, cell function integrity is critical to maintaining DNA. Individual cells contain mechanisms to repair their own DNA as many as 70,000 times a day. From this perspective, the in vitro laboratory study recently published in Viruses 2021, 13,2056, is indicative. It suggests a possible mechanism for vaccine harm. The study found that the spike protein localises in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding access of key DNA repair proteins. The findings reveal a potential molecular pathway by which the covid spike protein might impede adaptive immunity. They underscore the potential side effects of the full-length spike-based mRNA vaccines. Despite a degree of cellular autonomy, the nervous system and the physiology must and does function as a whole. The entire nervous system including the immune system is a ‘part and whole’ network. The whole is in every part, the DNA is in every cell, but cell function is also related to a generalised and interconnected genetic network—the holistic functioning of the physiological network is critical to its efficiency. Thus physiological network stability (health) can be impaired by the introduction of pieces of active genetic code (biologic instructions) like those contained in mRNA vaccines.

An analogy will make this clear. We are familiar with computer networks. A very common backbone of most commercial systems is produced by Microsoft. Each computer contains the Microsoft system and the network also runs under its system. The system is supported by computer code—a set of complex instructions written by Microsoft. Individual computers can perform standalone tasks and can communicate with other computers to keep the organisation running smoothly. This can be compared to the physiology. There are many systems in the body: immune system, circulatory system, digestive system, limbic system, homeostatic mechanisms, musculoskeletal structure, neural networks, and so on. They perform apparently stand alone functions, but all run on the basis of the same genetic code contained in our DNA and communicate with one another during the process of maintaining health. Back to our analogy: office staff sometimes send messages full of spelling errors to one another but this doesn’t harm the network. If however a computer virus written in code is sent by one computer it can overwhelm and crash network function because it affects the operating system. Some networks are protected by good firewalls and others are vulnerable. The Covid vaccine introduces a sequence of information written in genetic code into our physiology. It is no wonder that it could elicit such a very broad range of adverse effects, some of which are so serious as to be analogous to a computer network crash. Some individuals have strong immune systems and are little affected, others experience problems in one or other systems. The fact that a sequence of foreign code has been introduced into the physiology produces major risks to health, risks that those working in gene therapy for the last few decades are very familiar with. The extremely broad range of adverse effects revealed by the Pfizer document is the physiological signature of a general control system failure, a failure of the body’s overall integration and function. It is not plausible to suggest otherwise. That is why experts in genomics, even as I write, are pondering fundamental questions about the action and safety of mRNA vaccines. They are also urging caution.

Conclusion

The NZ government agreed commercial terms with a single company for vaccine supply. It is possible that vital information was withheld. The public was kept in ignorance of known risks. This has divided our society and undermined our fundamental Kiwi tolerance on the basis of not only incomplete but misleading safety data. The government is asleep at the wheel. Knowing full well that safety trials were incomplete, the government apparently accepted information supplied by multinational commercial interests at face value. This should be a ‘never again’ moment. There are huge lessons to be learned and an apology owed to the whole population. The provisions of the NZ BIll of Rights should be given constitutional status. The vaccine mandates should be withdrawn and those affected by them compensated. The proposed vaccination of 5 -11 year olds should be stopped.

below is the data from Pfizer that the FDA has just released you can scroll through it or download it.

Share this post

It’s not about health, it never was

If you want evidence then look at this rant from someone who learned the hard way.

Why No EUA for Highly Effective, Anti-COVID fluvoxamine?

Published on December 5, 2021

Written by Steve Kirsch

The reason is simple. We tried. And after 6 weeks of waiting, we were told that to get an EUA for a repurposed drug, you have to partner with a drug company in the EUA application.

Because no drug company will partner with us, even if we pay all the filing costs, there won’t be an EUA. Ever. So most doctors will never prescribe it for COVID, even thought it works better than anything else.

And the NIH won’t do anything with fluvoxamine either like add it to their guidelines. It will never be upgraded on the NIH COVID treatment guidelines. It is currently sitting at “NEUTRAL” after two trials where it had a 100% risk reduction in both trials without any downside risk. In short, if deployed it would likely save a lot of lives and there is no risk of deployment since the risks of the drug are well known. It’s a very safe drug when properly prescribed. I took it myself and I couldn’t tell I was on it the side-effects were so negligible.

When the fluvoxamine Phase 3 study published in Lancet showed the drug worked better than any other drug (including the new antiviral pills from Merck and Pfizer), the NIH simply ignored the study. They didn’t even mention it.

Even 60 Minutes which did a story on fluvoxamine didn’t mention the Phase 3 study proved it worked when the study came out (normally, they’d do this at the end of a show to let their audience know they got it right).

Fluvoxamine provides a 12-fold reduction in death if you started the drug early, but the NIH basically said “Ho hum. Only 12X reduction in death? That’s better than anything including the vaccines (which according to the Pfizer 6 month Phase 3 study was only a 2X reduction in mortality). So not even worth mentioning in the guidelines. It would save too many lives. Best to ignore it. And if we ignore it, no doctor in America will dare to prescribe it. So the vaccine will be the only option just like we planned.”

Cliff Lane, who heads the guidelines committee, reports to Fauci. Cliff simply isn’t going to allow the NIH recommendation to be modified no matter what the science says. This is not about saving lives. It never was.

When the key opinion leader (KOL) panel of NIH, CDC, FDA and academia experts recommended fluvoxamine be used back in January 2021, the NIH ignored that too. Jeffrey Klausner, who convened the panel, wrote a great op-ed about it in the Washington Post right after the meeting so everyone would know. Doctors ignored it.

Klausner shopped the KOL meeting notes to 10 journals, all of whom refused to publish it. Truly stunning! Life saving drug and nobody would publish the recommendation of an expert panel to use it. Wow.

When the KOL meeting notes were finally published in the peer-reviewed medical literature on December 1, 2021, only 12 months after the meeting, the NIH again did absolutely nothing, ignoring the advice of these key experts, even though now they have more data from the Together trial showing it works.

Basically, the system is set up so that only proprietary drugs that can kill you are approved.

So I wasted a lot of time and millions of dollars on proving that fluvoxamine works against COVID. I was right it does work. But Fauci is only going to allow a big Pharma solution to be adopted. Doctors do not follow the science. They follow what the NIH says. I should have known better. All these scientists had promised me “once it is proven in Phase 3 trials, everyone will adopt it.” That was a big fat lie. I fell for it. I won’t be so naïve the next time.

Note: I didn’t used to be so cynical, but there is simply no other rational explanation for this. This isn’t about science. This isn’t about saving lives. This is about profits and big pharma. Get it? I finally did. It was an expensive lesson.

See my fluvoxamine article for more info about how you can use it to save your life if you get COVID. Don’t expect your doctor to tell you about it.

More at stevekirsch.substack.com

Study published in Lancet linked below

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(21)00448-4/fulltext

Share this post

Definition of COVID Deaths in NZ

In case you weren’t aware of the New Zealand Ministry of Health definition of a COVID death, here it is word for word.

“Includes all cases that died who were classified as an active case of COVID-19 at the time of death. In some of these cases, the underlying cause of death may have been unrelated to COVID-19.”

This is also the definition of a COVID death for the global death tally we have been fixated with for the past 20 months.

Why not just people who actually died from COVID? And how many have actually died from COVID? we will never know the real number we will just be conditioned with this conflated number.

Share this post

More good news on Omicron

76% of hospital cases in SA were incidental. That’s right they were in hospital for other reasons and just happened to test positive for the Omicron.

Furthermore wastewater testing is finding huge prevalence of the Omicron which means it is infecting huge numbers who are not ending up in hospital.

The reality that Omicron has been sent to give us herd immunity is looking more positive that each day goes by.

I wonder how the likes of Pfizer are taking this news. You would have to imagine they will continue producing vaccines for those that want to be safe and effective.

The WHO and Bill Gates will continue to create more reasons to vaccinate people. Bill is already working on reintroducing smallpox.

However until then watch some good news.

Share this post

It’s bad news good news Monday

At least it is in the Herald

A single article on the herald app splits the articles on the Omicron. The article splitting the two headlines below is about what Northlanders think of the arrival of Aucklanders to their region.


https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/covid-19-omicron-outbreak-south-africas-new-virus-cases-double-in-one-day/ZK2L4P4X5AAG63UMCQKL3JYP4U/

Sounds bad doesn’t it? However once you have given yourself the heebee jeebees and fear of the Omicron, you can embrace it’s presence with some good news on it.


https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/covid-19-coronavirus-why-one-expert-says-omicron-variant-may-signal-the-end-of-covid/QUX2HI25576UZXGYAEVQTAQ2PQ/

The herald was previously busy sending fear that it’s now the children that need to be concerned, as the Omicron puts young children in hospital.

A fact so distorted it should be labelled fake news

Trying to quash the news that the variant is mild the following social media post from a “world-renowned” none the less epidemiologist.

“World-renowned Harvard-trained epidemiologist Eric Feigl-Ding responded to the news on social media.”

“Mild my ass,” he wrote. “The ‘highly transmissible’ Omicron variant is putting disproportionately large numbers of children under the age of 5 years old in hospitals.”

What is the real story?

Out of 1,511 hospitalisations the under nnes make up 113, and the kicker, all of them are considered mild and are being kept over night simply to ensure they can be monitored given the hospitals aren’t being over run. Sounds real bad

Here is the ever reliable Dr John Campbell on the real data.

Share this post

Here’s How You Can Unite!

Freedom Fighters everywhere – we need your help to share this new APP far and wide. You are NOT powerless to fight back against this oppression. You HAVE the power to HELP!

The Green Book has been designed to help the Freedom Fighter economy. By making conscious decisions to support businesses who refuse to be collaborators to government tyranny, we can ensure that these businesses not only survive, but thrive!

Even taking the govt’s conservative estimates – our numbers are somewhere around 500k – if we all make an intentional decision to only spend our dollars within this community, here is the power of our impact.

With an average spend of $25 per week (that’s a couple of coffees and a cake to share once per week) – we can circulate over $600 million dollars per annum in this economy!!

POWERFUL PEOPLE UNITE!

Brand new app for Businesses and services supporting kiwis freedoms.

You can download app here: https://tinyurl.com/downloadgreenbookapp

May be an image of 1 person and standing
Share this post

Anger after small businesses wait nearly an hour for police after call for help

What a time to be alive if you’re a criminal in NZ, you have the full support of the Govt.

Honour amongst thieves!

Some small businesses are concerned about how long it takes for police to arrive to their call-outs after an incident in which they say they waited for nearly an hour.

Some operators in the Auckland suburb of Hillsborough are among the latest to be affected by threatening behaviour from intoxicated and aggressive customers or passers-by.

They say despite calling for backup, officers did not get there in time.

Police said there were “other demands”, but they responded as soon as possible.

On Saturday afternoon, Udey Singh-Rana arrived at his curry restaurant with his wife and two daughters to prepare to open up. He saw his front door was smashed and an intoxicated man charged at him.

He then retreated to his car and called police but said they did not show up until about an hour later.

“We were calling … next door the liquor person was also calling continously,” Singh-Rana said.

“Police came very late, for maybe one hour [we waited].”

Jash Kanakia, the manager of a liquor store on the same premises, said the drunk man had been causing issues there for a while.

He said the man punched their grille door after staff refused to let him in and sell him alcohol, and yelled racist and threatening comments.

CCTV footage also shows the man chasing customers away, breaking a letter box, tossing around road cones, advertisement stands and a wood pallet.

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/12/anger-after-small-businesses-wait-nearly-an-hour-for-police-after-call-for-help.html?cid=soc4%3Anewshubfb&fbclid=IwAR3tIFKceLLxGtj-j9ZHcQDOYyfo-FnTFw7Fs9uH_C5rNg9rf_GBTGdggHQ

Small businesses FUMING after wait for police reaches nearly an hour
Share this post

Bravo Brian!

You’d have to feel your operation was pretty much bulletproof before you sent this to your suppliers and clients, but according to Russell Brand we’ll all lose our businesses anyway unless we do something to stop this.

Its not meant for cafes or hairdressers who don’t have a legal choice but for companies who are doing it because they don’t know any better, like PB Tech and Downers for instance.

They need it explained to them by their source of profit: You.

May be an image of text
Share this post